Apple will raise the starting price of every iPhone 18 model by $100 this fall, according to people familiar with the matter cited by GSMArena, after memory-chip costs made full absorption impossible. The iPhone 18 Pro is expected to open at $1,199, up from the 17 Pro’s $1,099, a move that keeps the lineup inside the same band as recently hiked Samsung and Google flagships.
The company had tried to shield the iPhone after lifting Mac and iPad prices in June. Slimmer margins now look like the only way to share the shock without handing the premium tier to rivals.
The decision closes a short window in which the phone line stayed frozen while every other major hardware family moved. Once the Pro bill of materials jumped by more than 40 percent, the shield could not hold. A flat consumer step across all four models became the path that still left Apple eating part of the spike.
What a Flat $100 Lift Means Across the Lineup
The $100 adder applies to the entire series rather than a steeper Pro-only jump some earlier forecasts floated. That produces a clean set of new entry points while Apple still eats part of the bill-of-materials spike.
| Model | Prior Start | Expected Start | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPhone 18 | $799 | $899 | +$100 |
| iPhone 18 Air / Plus | $899 | $999 | +$100 |
| iPhone 18 Pro | $1,099 | $1,199 | +$100 |
| iPhone 18 Pro Max | $1,199 | $1,299 | +$100 |
Notebookcheck, citing Mark Gurman, notes the Pro figure is a 9 percent rise and lands level with the discounted Galaxy S26 Ultra. Higher storage tiers will likely carry larger absolute jumps so Apple protects gross profit on the 512 GB and 1 TB configurations where NAND costs bite hardest.
Uniform dollars mask uneven percentages. The base iPhone moves from $799 to $899, a steeper relative step than the Pro Max climb from $1,199 to $1,299. Apple still chose one adder for every model rather than scaling the hike by tier. That keeps the internal gaps familiar and avoids a headline that singles out any single SKU.
Base configurations stay the psychological anchors. The heavier absolute lifts land on the high-storage builds, where the memory line item is largest and where buyers already expect to pay a premium for capacity.
Memory Now Owns the Bill of Materials
TrendForce calculates the 256 GB iPhone 18 Pro will carry a 38 percent higher bill of materials than its predecessor. Memory’s share of that BOM has already climbed from roughly 10 percent a year ago to about 34 percent in the third quarter of 2026 and is projected to top 40 percent in the first half of 2027.
- DRAM and NAND together now outrank the application processor and the display as the single largest cost block.
- Five- to sevenfold memory price rise since early 2025, driven by AI data-center demand for HBM that crowds out consumer DRAM and NAND capacity.
- 12 GB LPDDR5X package alone estimated near $145, versus roughly $39 total memory cost on the prior Pro generation.
One detailed breakdown puts the full memory package for a 12 GB / 256 GB Pro near memory package costs near $196. That is the figure forcing the retail adjustment.
| Checkpoint | Memory Share of BOM |
|---|---|
| About a year ago | Roughly 10 percent |
| Third quarter 2026 | About 34 percent |
| First half 2027 (projected) | Above 40 percent |
TSMC’s 2 nm process for the A20 Pro adds another layer of expense, yet the memory line item is the one that flipped the cost stack.
The stack reverse matters for every later pricing choice. When DRAM and NAND outrank the processor and the display, a process-node premium is no longer the main lever. Capacity allocation for HBM in data centers keeps pulling wafers away from consumer LPDDR and NAND, so the pressure does not ease with a single quarter of phone builds.
Apple Will Still Sacrifice Gross Margin
People familiar with the planning say Apple first hoped to swallow the entire increase. That plan collapsed once component bills rose more than 40 percent on the Pro models. The $100 consumer step now lets the company share the pain while still cutting its own margin to protect volume.
Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable. We’re doing our best to mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we’ve been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable.
Tim Cook, Apple CEO, Wall Street Journal interview
Cook earlier called the shortage a “hundred-year flood” he had never seen in more than 40 years in the industry. TrendForce expects Apple to copy the MacBook playbook: accept lower gross margin so shipment momentum and market share do not crack. The loyal installed base gives Apple more room than most rivals; a further hike later remains possible if memory stays elevated.
Margin give is the tool that keeps the Pro expected start at $1,199 instead of a higher print that would break the band shared with Samsung and Google flagships. Volume and premium share stay the priority. Profit per unit bends so the installed base does not have to absorb the full component shock in one step.
That same logic leaves a door open. If memory stays elevated into 2027, another adjustment can still arrive after the September lock-in. The first $100 step is a share of the pain, not a promise that the share is finished.
June Mac and iPad Hikes Set the Template
- June 17, 2026, Cook tells the Journal that price rises are unavoidable and describes the memory crunch as a hundred-year flood.
- June 25, 2026, Apple lifts starting prices across Macs, iPads, HomePods, Apple TV and Vision Pro by an average of roughly 23 percent; MacBook Air up $200, Mac Studio up as much as $500 or more.
- Early August 2026, TrendForce publishes the 38 percent BOM forecast and warns memory will exceed 40 percent of cost.
- Late August 2026, Multiple tipsters and GSMArena’s more reputable source converge on a uniform $100 iPhone 18 series increase.
The iPhone was deliberately spared in June. That buffer is now gone.
The Mac and iPad move supplied the proof of concept. Apple showed it would raise hardware prices when component bills turned unsustainable, then held the phone line as long as the BOM math allowed. The August BOM work and the late-August tipster convergence simply closed the gap the June shield had left open.
Average lifts near 23 percent on the June families dwarf the 9 percent Pro step now expected on the iPhone. The phone still receives gentler treatment in percentage terms. The template is the same: share the increase, keep flagship positioning intact, and accept thinner gross margin rather than cede volume.
Android Faces a Steeper Pass-Through
Samsung’s Device eXperience unit paid 211 percent more for external mobile memory in the first half of 2026 than the 2025 average. Industry average selling prices rose 17 percent in the second quarter even as some premium brands held volume. Budget and mid-range lines, already thin on margin, have less ability to absorb; several makers have already raised prices 20-30 percent or quietly cut storage and RAM on entry models.
Google’s recent Pixel moves and Google’s own higher-price efficiency bet show the same pressure. Because Apple can still dial back its famous margins, its $100 step looks conservative next to what lower-tier Android vendors may need just to stay above water. TrendForce expects global smartphone production to stay under downward pressure through 2027 as memory costs keep weighing on demand.
- Samsung DX memory bill: 211 percent higher in the first half of 2026 versus the 2025 average.
- Industry ASPs: up 17 percent in the second quarter.
- Budget and mid-range response: 20-30 percent price rises or quiet cuts to storage and RAM.
- Apple’s contrasting lever: a flat $100 step plus margin sacrifice on the Pro tier.
Premium Android can attempt the same margin math. Entry lines cannot. When memory already dominates the bill, a thin mid-range P&L leaves only list-price hikes or spec cuts. That split, not the iPhone adder alone, is what keeps global production under pressure through 2027.
Forecast Camps Converge on One Hundred
Before the late-August consensus hardened, outside forecasts sat far apart. JPMorgan’s earlier $50 ceiling treated the iPhone as still able to absorb most of the shock. TechInsights-style $200-plus reads treated the full memory spike as a near pass-through to the sticker.
Neither pole matched Apple’s revealed playbook on Mac and iPad. The June average lift near 23 percent proved the company would move prices, yet the decision to spare the iPhone at that moment also proved it would not lead with the harshest phone hike available.
The $100 figure splits those camps. It clears the old $50 ceiling, stays well below the $200-plus upper reads, and lands the Pro at a 9 percent rise that still sits level with the discounted Galaxy S26 Ultra. Samsung and Google flagship prints already marked the band; Apple’s step keeps the lineup inside it.
September’s event will lock the final grid. Until the numbers are official, the direction rests on the same three facts already in view: a 38 percent BOM increase on the 256 GB Pro, memory’s climb toward 40 percent of cost, and a company willing to cut its own margin to protect volume.
Base Models Stay Psychologically Reachable
Rationing shows up in more than the sticker. Separate reporting already shows scarce memory hits premium models first in Apple’s own launch sequencing. High-end DRAM goes where the company can still defend gross profit after the consumer step, then filters into the wider lineup.
Higher storage SKUs carry the heaviest absolute increases. NAND costs bite hardest on the 512 GB and 1 TB builds, so those configurations become the valve for profit protection. The $899, $999, $1,199 and $1,299 entry points stay cleaner. Buyers who want maximum capacity pay more of the memory bill; buyers who stay on base storage meet a smaller dollar hurdle.
That split is how the flat $100 adder coexists with a five- to sevenfold memory price rise since early 2025. The headline step is uniform. The recovery of margin is not. Launch order, storage mix and residual margin give do the rest of the work the sticker cannot do alone.
Where the Pain Lands Next
The second-order effects sit outside the $100 sticker. Memory makers (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron) capture the upside from AI-driven scarcity. Apple protects its premium share by accepting thinner profits and keeping the Pro under $1,200. Mid-range Android lines risk culls or further spec downgrades. Consumers who upgrade every two or three years will simply pay more; those who stretch devices longer will stretch further.
Separate reporting already shows scarce memory hits premium models first in Apple’s own launch sequencing, another sign the company is rationing high-end DRAM. Higher storage SKUs will carry the heaviest absolute increases so that base models stay psychologically reachable.
JPMorgan’s earlier $50 ceiling looks too low against the newest consensus; TechInsights-style $200-plus forecasts look too high once Apple’s margin give is factored in. The $100 figure splits the difference and matches what Samsung and Google already posted.
The upgrade-cycle math is straightforward. A buyer on a two- or three-year rhythm meets the new floor at the next trade-in. A buyer who already stretches past that window gains another reason to wait, which softens near-term demand even as installed-base loyalty cushions Apple more than most rivals.
September’s event will lock the numbers. Until then the direction is settled: memory, not silicon process or camera modules, now sets the price floor for the next iPhone cycle.





