Georgia’s ruling party is moving to extend broadcast regulations to online media platforms, a move sparking heated debate over press freedom and government control.
From TV Screens to News Feeds
The Georgian Dream party is pushing a new set of amendments to the country’s Broadcasting Law, aiming to pull online media under the same content rules that traditional TV and radio broadcasters face. It’s a significant shift — one that could reshape how Georgians consume and create digital content.
Archil Gorduladze, chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee, presented the updated proposal to Parliament’s Sectoral Economy and Economic Policy Committee. He made it clear: the current system isn’t enough. “During the first reading, we reached a consensus that content standards applied to broadcasters should also cover online media,” he said.
This means that websites, social media pages, and online news platforms could soon be subject to the same oversight as television stations. Supporters say it’s a long-overdue step to regulate a fast-changing digital space. Critics, however, call it a thinly veiled attempt to silence dissenting voices online.
Striking a Balance or Strangling Free Speech?
The proposed amendments have split the public. Proponents argue the changes ensure accountability and prevent misinformation, especially with social media increasingly shaping public opinion.
Opponents, though, see something darker beneath the surface. They warn that broad, ambiguous rules could give the government more power to control online content, paving the way for censorship.
- Supporters say the law will:
- Prevent the spread of fake news.
- Ensure fair competition between traditional and digital media.
- Promote responsible journalism online.
- Critics argue the law might:
- Limit freedom of expression.
- Grant authorities the power to shut down critical platforms.
- Create a chilling effect, discouraging independent reporting.
It’s a tug-of-war between order and openness, and right now, neither side looks ready to back down.
The Road to Regulation — What’s Next?
The proposal still needs to pass several parliamentary stages before becoming law. Each step is expected to trigger more fiery debate.
The bill is currently undergoing a second reading, with amendments still on the table. Legal experts are dissecting the wording, trying to define what exactly qualifies as “online media” — a slippery term in the internet age.
Meanwhile, international watchdogs are keeping a close eye on Georgia. Organizations like Reporters Without Borders and the European Federation of Journalists have voiced concern over similar laws worldwide, noting that regulation often starts with good intentions but ends up muzzling the press.
For now, all eyes are on Parliament. The outcome could set a precedent for other nations balancing regulation with digital freedom.
